President Donald Trump and Elon Musk have proposed privatizing the United States Postal Service by selling it off to a corporation, such as Federal Express or UPS.
A new Institute for Policy Studies report shows which ZIP codes in Mississippi and across the nation would likely pay higher parcel rates to cast ballots or receive medicines and other essential items.
Co-author Sarah Anderson said more than 100,000 Mississippians in rural areas, small towns, and even suburbs on less profitable routes would take the biggest hit.
"Without competition from a public service that has a mandate to provide affordable delivery to every address in America," said Anderson, "people in these areas in particular might lose their delivery at their homes altogether."
The push to privatize USPS aligns with the Trump administration's pledge to shrink government programs deemed inefficient.
While supporters claim corporations could provide better service at lower costs, Mississippi postal workers have mobilized against the plan - joining nationwide protests during last month's National Day of Action.
Currently, U.S. Postal Service parcel rates are between 25% to 60% lower than rates charged by FedEx and UPS.
Anderson said to keep prices down, a private company would likely use more part-time workers - who would get lower wages, fewer hours, worse benefits, and less job security.
She said the USPS has historically provided good-paying jobs in Mississippi and across the country.
"And doing work that really helps bind the nation together," said Anderson. "And that was the original vision of the postal service. It's in our Constitution, that it should help connect rural to urban areas and level the playing field."
Americans across the political spectrum have voiced strong support for the USPS and its public mission, and Anderson notes there are currently bipartisan resolutions against privatization in the U.S. House and Senate.
She said she hopes the president is listening to the people in his own party.
"Who are speaking out in support of keeping the postal service public," said Anderson, "and keeping its mandate to provide universal service to every American no matter where you live."
get more stories like this via email
The mayor of a rural Utah town said the clean energy investments and tax credits created by the Inflation Reduction Act are helping drive economic growth and diversify her town's energy portfolio.
Lenise Peterman, mayor of Helper, stressed tax credits have been vital for communities like hers as they help modernize their systems. But the budget reconciliation package now in Congress would eliminate major parts of Inflation Reduction Act funding, including clean energy investments.
Peterman said it could be detrimental to local people who have been able to harness the power of tax credits to grow their businesses.
"The jobs are there," Peterman emphasized. "We just need to ensure that we have the educational resources available - especially to people who may be transitioning out of a traditional coal plant or coal mining, to be able to step into those roles. But the roles are there."
She added while federal dollars in rural communities affect fewer people, their effect is triple that of urban communities. Peterman said the Inflation Reduction Act incentives will foster energy independence as power use and costs are projected to increase. Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, has been an outspoken critic of sunsetting the credits.
Peterman pointed out Helper is in a unique position, since the town of about 2,200 residents owns and operates its own electric grid. It purchases power from transmission stations but Peterman said they face challenges due to the town's aging and limited infrastructure. She sees the tax credits as part of the solution.
"For me, it's about hardening the grid so that we can then incorporate other energy types, which I hope will drive costs down for the consumers," Peterman underscored. "Because now we'll have options and not be beholden to a single energy source."
Republican leadership in Congress is hoping to pass the big budget bill and have it signed by President Donald Trump before July 4. Peterman hopes politicians are able to reach consensus and do what is best for all, rural and urban alike.
"I'm hopeful that we can move past the partisan positions that people seem to be stuck in and do what's best for all of the people," Peterman added. "I really hope that comes to fruition."
get more stories like this via email
It is not just the weather or commodity prices farmers have to worry about. Many rural communities struggle to keep their roads and bridges in good shape, making farming life even harder and now, North Dakota is trying to correct the issue.
This year, state lawmakers have expanded eligibility for agriculture infrastructure grants awarded to towns with populations under 1,500.
Rob Schmidt, chairman of the Olivier County Commission and a rancher in Hensler, said it is welcome news because some local roads have self-imposed speed limits of 25 miles an hour because of the shape they are in, citing the effects from heavy truck traffic linked to a nearby refinery and an ethanol plant.
"Basically, there's no local money to fix that wear," Schmidt explained. "Any money that would come from the state would certainly be appreciated to help remedy that."
Schmidt, also a member of the North Dakota Farmers Union, is hopeful some jurisdictions in his part of the state are able to take advantage of the changes. Oliver County's total population is around 2,000, with the biggest town home to 500 people. The grant program was established in 2023.
Schmidt noted rebuilding roads and bridges could join other quality-of-life benchmarks his county is trying to highlight in the long-standing push to attract residents.
"We've got a very nice school here and we've got all the infrastructure in place in town to be thriving a lot more than we are," Schmidt emphasized.
He acknowledged even when a smaller town makes infrastructure improvements and attracts more industry, it does not always result in bigger population numbers. He said they have had issues in the past where people might take a new job in the area but still commute from elsewhere.
Disclosure: The North Dakota Farmers Union contributes to our fund for reporting on Rural/Farming issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., said AM radio is essential to keeping Nevadans informed, especially in emergency situations, which is why she is one of many supporting the bipartisan AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act.
The legislation, which is under consideration in Congress, would require all new cars to maintain AM radio technology despite many having made the switch to now using satellite or internet services in their cars.
Lee said while AM radio does have a sense of nostalgia associated with it, it is also about ensuring people do not lose access to essential information, such as through the National Public Warning System.
"It plays such a vital role in our emergency infrastructure," Lee emphasized. "This country is moving towards digitalizing everything but ultimately there are instances where cell coverage goes out, where things go out, and having AM radios in cars is incredibly important."
Opponents of the bill feel mandating AM radio in all new cars without addressing the radio royalty issue for sound recordings is counterintuitive. Current U.S. copyright law does not provide artists with royalties when recordings are broadcast on AM and FM radio as it does on digital streaming services, which is why calls are being made to also consider the American Music Fairness Act.
Lee noted AM radio is highly important to rural and agricultural communities, relying on the service for things such as weather updates and other necessary information and Lee added they are not the only ones.
"We all know that cybersecurity is a key issue that we are dealing with, especially in an urban center like Las Vegas," Lee pointed out. "Making sure you have sort of that stalwart in cars that can be uninterrupted is really important."
Lee stressed it is not just about having what she calls "outgoing" sources of information, but also "incoming" information provided by people about what is happening on the ground. She added it was true during the 2017 Route 91 Harvest music festival mass shooting, which left 60 people dead and many others wounded.
get more stories like this via email