A new report showed a growing problem of harmful pesticides in Connecticut waterways.

The University of Connecticut study analyzed 20 years of data, finding neonicotinoids are increasingly prevalent in the state's waterways. Levels of the pesticides in rivers are higher than Environmental Protection Agency standards.

Louise Washer, organizer for the environmental advocacy coalition Connecticut Pesticide Reform, said the pesticides harm river-dwelling mayflies.

"We see a quarter of the mayflies in the Norwalk River, for example, than were observed in 1989," Washer reported. "We see a third of the richness of mayfly species than were observed in 1989."

While many factors affect mayflies' population numbers, their sensitivity to neonics is a major factor in population decline. As comprehensive as the report is, Washer argued more testing is needed in certain places. Previous reports showed the chemicals have vast human health effects.

Connecticut lawmakers introduced bills banning neonicotinoids in previous legislative sessions. Despite widespread support, they never made it out of committee.

Neonicotinoids have been banned or heavily restricted in numerous areas for the harmful effects they have on wildlife. The pesticides are commonly used, which is one of the biggest hurdles to banning them. Connecticut golf courses are the heaviest users of neonicotinoids for grub control and farmers use seeds coated with them for pest control.

Washer pointed out there are some better ways to use pesticides.

"Integrated pest management is a term that means treating pests that are actually present and using the least toxic pesticide available to do that," Washer explained. "The problem with some of these prophylactic uses is that integrated pest management kind of gets thrown out the window because you're using the stuff whether there's a problem or not."

Products like Grub Gone are less toxic than neonics for lawn care. As for treated seeds, Washer pointed to another pesticide called diamides. Though it's less toxic to bees, it poses higher risks to butterflies and moths. The hope is more sustainable practices protect birds, pollinators and human health.


get more stories like this via email

Forty religious leaders from different denominations gathered in Texas this week to call for an end to fossil-fuel subsidies and expansion of related infrastructure.The meeting occurred just days before the Environmental Protection Agency announced it is rolling back landmark environmental regulations.

Aly Tharp, Gulf South organizer for GreenFaith USA, said the faith community has a moral obligation to oppose the cuts and organize against the changes.

"So, when we listen to the science and when we listen to Scripture, to moral lessons from all faith traditions,' she said, "it's a clear call that we're on a path that's mutually assured destruction. And we must change and start investing in our common survival. "

The religious leaders took part in public demonstrations outside the annual oil and gas industry CERAWeek conference in Houston. They also drafted a letter to the Trump Administration calling for subsidy money to be redirected to improve the environment.

Faith leaders toured communities near fossil-fuel facilities in the Houston area. Ilka Vega, executive for economic and environmental justice for United Women in Faith, said the neighborhoods are predominantly made up of low-income people of color.

"Seeing through their eyes what used to be their post office, their houses, their schools and everything that was taken away from them," she said. "Places where they would go fishing and where they would go swimming and have fun, that were contaminated."

The head of the EPA has said he and President Donald Trump support rewriting the agency's 2009 finding that planet-warming greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.

Religious leaders and people of diverse faiths are being invited to sign the letter to the Trump administration on the GreenFaith USA website.

Virginia has certain restrictions in place for workers handling animal waste in order to avoid contaminating groundwater sources. But one expert says the Commonwealth could do more to educate people about the risk.

Last year, Virginia updated regulations for animal waste at animal feeding operations. One of those regulations included ensuring that storage areas are higher than one foot above the seasonal high water table.

Bryan Dunning, a senior policy analyst for the nonprofit Center for Progressive Reform, said the Commonwealth took a step in the right direction with increased monitoring.

"It's for all facilities constructed after '98," he said. "So, that is some improved monitoring to get an idea of if there are problems with the facility that is breaching into the groundwater."

Dunning added that pre-1998 systems are grandfathered in under the new regulations. The agriculture industry accounts for half of the nitrogen and phosphorus that sucks oxygen out of Chesapeake Bay, which is needed to sustain aquatic life.

Dunning said Virginia officials could take steps to further combat groundwater contamination from manure at animal-feeding operations. That includes making data electronically available to the general public without the need to file a Freedom of Information Act request.

"Public information for these sorts of things is really important because if you source your water for your house from a private well, you're responsible for making sure that your water's clean," he said. "And without having that sort of publicly available database, basically to increase public knowledge, you're kind of operating in an information blackhole. "

Dunning added that unauthorized discharge of animal waste should be publicly disclosed. Confinement operators have said they are always looking for ways to be more environmentally friendly, while also keeping up with consumer demand for high-quality meat.


get more stories like this via email

Environmental advocates are waiting for results from legislation passed last year, regulating the use of industrial sludge from flowing into waterways like the Chesapeake Bay.

Before laws were passed, the state had limited regulations dealing with the handling and use of industrial sludge, often made up of leftovers from meat processing facilities, which are then used as farmland fertilizers. Mishandling or overuse of the fertilizers would lead to the contamination of groundwater and flow into waterways.

Evan Isaacson, senior attorney for the Chesapeake Legal Alliance, said it was even common for neighboring states with tighter regulations on industrial sludge to transport it to Maryland for dumping.

"We had essentially become the dumping ground for industrial sludge," Isaacson recounted. "It was just an opportunistic business opportunity, I guess, for that industry to evade existing regulatory frameworks in their home states and send it to Maryland."

A 2023 study by the University of Maryland found more than half of industrial sludge land applied in Maryland came from other states. The Maryland Department of Agriculture oversees the year-old regulations governing industrial sludge.

Isaacson argued the department could change regulations to promote more transparency or put out a report on industrial sludge. He pointed out some issues, like farm privacy, means the department's regulations are not always created with as much transparency in mind, like with the Maryland Department of the Environment. Isaacson hopes other states without regulations will introduce their own standards to keep industrial sludge from being dumped in neighboring states.

"Once this regulatory program is up and running properly, it fixes that problem," Isaacson emphasized. "At the very least, we're hoping that we no longer become the regional dumping ground and that those sources in Delaware and Virginia keep their material in Delaware and Virginia."

The neighboring states of Pennsylvania and West Virginia currently have no regulations on the use and dumping of industrial sludge.


get more stories like this via email