A federal judge will hold a court hearing today on the legality of President Donald Trump's recent executive order to freeze federal grants and loans last week.
Despite the original memo having been rescinded, Nevada groups said federal cuts remain in place and pose threats to Nevada's clean energy future.
Jarrett Clark, spokesperson for the advocacy group For Our Future Nevada, said he worries about the precedent and instability recent executive orders will set, especially in Nevada where federal funding makes up 37% of the state's budget.
"With all of the federal incentives, the tax credits, rebates, investments, things that have been coming from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act, businesses have been counting on those to expand their operations in our state," Clark pointed out. "And are already underway in adding jobs, building this infrastructure."
Trump's actions would leave more than 21,000 jobs and more than $15 billion in investments within Nevada's clean energy sector in limbo. The White House has stated the freeze was needed to ensure federal spending was in line with Trump's priorities. Clark countered disruptions, even if temporary, can pose dire consequences for people on the ground.
Audrey Peral, program director for the advocacy group Chispa Nevada, part of the League of Conservation Voters, called the state a clean energy leader. Since the passage of the Nevada Clean Energy Fund, 20 new clean energy projects have taken root in the Silver State.
Peral cautioned despite the progress, many are still suffering from the effects of rising costs and climate change.
"Consumers want options to save money on their electricity and gas bills, like discounts to buy more efficient appliances or programs that just give access to community solar," Peral contended. "Trump is taking all these options away from consumers and leaving them with these higher bills with no options or solutions for anything better."
Kristee Watson, executive director of the Nevada Conservation League, urged elected officials, regardless of political party, to feel empowered to fight for federal dollars, which she stressed are crucial for all Nevada.
Watson pointed out Project 2025 is the playbook currently getting rolled out.
"We knew it was coming, we told voters it was coming," Watson emphasized. "Trump and his allies, that are billionaires and big polluter donors, told us what they would do. This is not surprising. Is it chaos? Is it disappointing? Is it heartbreaking? Yes. Is it surprising? No."
Watson encouraged Nevadans to pay attention and make their voices heard to their elected officials.
Disclosure: For Our Future Nevada and the Nevada Conservation League contribute to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Climate Change/Air Quality, Health Issues, Housing/Homelessness, Public Lands/Wilderness, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Indiana lawmakers introduced a third property tax plan this week, aiming to protect local governments from funding cuts while offering minimal relief to homeowners.
The proposal, led by state Rep. Jeff Thompson, R-Lizton, would change how property taxes are calculated, including phasing out certain homestead deductions and shifting local income tax authority.
"When you raise the rate, pocketbook lost some money," he said. "You lower the rate; pocketbook gains some money - that's the right system. It won't be always smooth, but the alternative is where we're at right now, and we can continue on down the path and we'll have the same results."
Thompson's plan joins competing proposals from Gov. Mike Braun and Senate Republicans. Braun's plan, which was central to his campaign, would significantly cut property taxes but at the expense of local government funding. The Senate version proposes smaller cuts to both homeowner taxes and local budgets.
David Ober, vice president for taxation and public finance at the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, told lawmakers that changes to the business personal property tax rate were "a bit of a double-edged sword."
"It eliminates the aggregate floor," he said. "It doesn't eliminate individual pool floors. A lot of businesses' personal property is sitting at that floor - at that 30% - but if you eliminate that 30% floor, it's not like it goes down to zero."
Despite the differences, all three plans would shift tax burdens between property classes.
Critics argued that reducing business taxes could place more financial pressure on homeowners. The Ways and Means Committee is also considering separate legislation to gradually lower the state income tax rate if revenue growth meets specific targets.
get more stories like this via email
In a significant development for family caregivers across America, AARP is spearheading initiatives at both federal and state levels to provide tax relief for those caring for loved ones. The organization is championing the Credit for Caring Act, which proposes a $5,000 federal tax credit, while also pursuing similar legislation at the state level in Ohio.
Jenny Carlson, AARP Ohio state director, said it's a comprehensive approach to supporting the 48 million Americans who serve as family caregivers.
"We're doubling down on this initiative! We feel strongly that it's going to work on the national level. We are turning our attention to the state law, working towards (a) swift package so that family caregivers could take advantage of it for their 2026 returns," she explained.
Carlson added that Ohio is home to approximately 1.5 million family caregivers, providing an estimated $21 billion worth of unpaid care each year. She added they struggle to balance caregiving with full-time jobs, often sacrificing income and retirement savings. The proposed tax credit has received bipartisan support.
AARP has been vocal in its support for Rep. Mike Carey, R-OH, who is sponsoring the legislation in Congress. Carlson emphasized the importance of enabling caregivers to continue working while supporting their loved ones.
"It's called the Credit for Caring Act, which would provide eligible working caregivers a tax credit to help offset the costs of care that they offer. It would allow them to continue to work while caring for a loved one through illness, disability and aging in place," Carlson said.
A recent AARP backed survey found that 84% of voters across party lines support a tax credit for family caregivers. However, some experts caution that while tax relief is helpful, broader policies-such as increased Medicaid coverage for home care may be necessary to fully address the challenges caregivers face. The bill's future now rests with Congress.
Disclosure: AARP Ohio contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Health Issues, Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Dozens of local leaders from California are in the nation's capital this week, joining about 2,800 colleagues from around the country at the National League of Cities' Congressional City Conference.
The group met with White House officials Tuesday and is set to see Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., today.
David Sander, a council member and former mayor in the city of Rancho Cordova and immediate past president of the league, said local leaders want to find out how the "DOGE" cuts could impact their cities' bottom lines.
"Because there are so many changes potentially underway, we're really focused on certainty and stability," Sander explained. "Because it's hard in local government, where everything has to work, and we're held accountable."
Local officials are concerned the budget bill being prepped in Congress could eliminate the tax-free status cities now get on their municipal bonds, financing priorities like roads and schools. And in the upcoming transportation bill, local leaders want to continue the previous Trump administration practice of sending funds directly to municipalities, rather than routing them through the state.
Sanders pointed out the briefing on immigration covered the many legal issues surrounding cities' policies on cooperation with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
"There's an awful lot in the hands of the courts right now," Sanders observed. "Trying to understand the role of a federal detainer versus a federal warrant, versus a local warrant; trying to understand the legalities around all those and what cities can or can't do."
California is home to multiple so-called sanctuary cities, including Berkeley, Fremont, Oakland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Ana and Watsonville. The conference wraps up today.
get more stories like this via email