Nebraska is one of three states with paid sick leave on the ballot next month.

Nebraska women are disproportionately affected by a lack of paid sick leave, since they are more apt to work part-time. Only around 12% of the state's part-time workers receive paid sick leave, including employees of Vis Major Brewing Company in Omaha.

Lindsey Clements, co-owner of the company, said everyone begins accruing sick leave their first day of training. She explained they implemented a paid sick leave policy in early 2023 after having trouble finding and retaining workers.

"It really was a need for us to add more value for our employees to attract some quality folks to come in and work for us," Clements explained. "We recognize we've got to do our part to take care of the folks that help operate our business from day to day."

The Paid Sick Leave for Nebraskans initiative is supported by more than 200 Nebraska businesses and dozens of organizations. Employers with fewer than 20 employees would have to provide 40 hours of paid sick leave per year, and 56 hours for those with more than 20. Nearly 250,000 Nebraska workers currently lack paid sick leave.

Opponents of Initiative 436 maintain it would create a financial burden for Nebraska businesses.
However, studies show the benefits of paid sick leave, including increased job satisfaction and productivity, lower turnover and better overall employee health, outweigh the additional cost to employers.

Clements noted this matches what they have experienced.

"Frankly, it's easier running a business when you allow for your people to take care of themselves when they are sick," Clements emphasized. "Because we have such a small team, we really can't allow one another to pass along illnesses."

While acknowledging providing paid sick leave will be a challenge for some Nebraska businesses, especially those for whom business has not completely returned to pre-pandemic levels, Clements recommends it.

"I think that with the hope that things will continue to pivot and improve, it's good to "normalize" these benefits that we're providing for our employees," she asserted.

Washington, D.C., 15 states and a number of municipalities require some amount of paid sick leave. Missouri and Alaska voters will join Nebraskans in deciding the fate of paid sick leave in their state this year.


get more stories like this via email

More than 1,100 caregivers at Portland's Providence St. Vincent Medical Center have voted to unionize, joining the Service Employees International Union Local 49.

Hospital staffers, including certified nursing assistants, cooks, lab assistants, pharmacy techs, environmental workers and patient representatives, will soon begin collective bargaining with management over a new work contract.

Finn McCool, senior food service attendant at Providence St. Vincent Medical Center in Portland, said changes to working conditions in the hospital were a major driver to organize.

"There's a lot that makes St. Vincent a great place to work, but we've also seen just tons of changes over the years around staffing and benefits," McCool explained. "My fellow caregivers really knew that jobs were only going to get harder."

The St. Vincent caregivers will join thousands of other unionized workers at Providence hospitals in Oregon, Washington state and other parts of the country. Providence officials released a statement, recognizing the union and saying they were prepared to work with it toward a new contract.

McCool noted the company made several changes to staffing and work policies without feedback from its employees, with changes to the employees' health care benefits causing a major upheaval.

"It's been a recent change to our health care plan with Aetna switching over, and that was probably a very large reason why a lot of us decided to vote yes," McCool pointed out. "We had our own internal health care system. We changed to a different thing. Co-pays changed. Things were definitely a lot harder with increased deductibles."

McCool stressed political uncertainty, particularly in the government's health care policies, was also a significant concern.

"We're seeing a lot of changes going on with the government with cuts, especially right now," McCool observed. "What threatens us is cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. Our CEO said, 'These cuts are threatening the hospital.'"

The multistate Providence Health System announced it will close the maternity center at one of its Montana hospitals in October.

Opponents are hoping the corporation will reverse its decision at negotiations starting next week. The Family Maternity Center at Missoula's Providence St. Patrick Hospital has delivered about 450 babies each year over the last several, and serves many people from the surrounding small towns.

Robin Haux, labor program director for the Montana Nurses Association, said the layoff notification came as a big surprise and will affect moms and babies, nurses and Missoula's other hospital.

"Not only were the nurses provided just a four-month turnaround, so was the community, so was Community Medical Center," Haux explained. "This has triggered a pretty large scrambling of trying to get prepared."

The cut comes as U.S. lawmakers close in on the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," the Republican budget megabill proposing cuts to Medicaid which could close rural hospitals. Providence said the closure is due to "declining birth volumes" and "workforce shortages."

Megan Carey, labor and delivery nurse in the Family Maternity Center at Providence St. Patrick Hospital, said no one from the Family Maternity Center was included in the decision.

"We were told there was a discernment team as well as external stakeholders," Carey pointed out. "It's just really disappointing that administration could not look inward to better go about this process."

Carey added Providence sent what she calls an "unsettling" message informing nurses they could apply to work in other departments at St. Patrick Hospital but there would not be enough jobs for them all.


get more stories like this via email

As more women enter the construction industry, a group in Philadelphia is working to support them and advance diversity amid political challenges to DEI programs.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a nearly 45% increase in women in construction over the past decade.

Amy Novak, president of the Philadelphia chapter of Professional Women in Construction, said recent federal actions against DEI initiatives have prompted the relaunch of their empowering committee, which focuses on development and educational sessions.

"We choose to focus on empowering women to solve issues, be a part of the resolution of issues," Novak explained. "And also to feel supported, to be an advocate for diversity, equity and inclusion programs."

The Biden administration implemented widespread diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives across nearly all areas of the federal government from military operations to airline safety policies. Critics argued the programs amount to unlawful and unethical discrimination.

Novak said a recent Professional Women in Construction report showed strong support for diversity, equity and inclusion among those involved with the group. She added her group is committed to growing the talent pipeline in construction, architecture and engineering from trades to professional roles by expanding partnerships that boost early STEM interest, starting in middle school.

"We have our Connecting Committee, which goes out and regularly interacts at college campuses," Novak pointed out. "Not just to women who are in engineering, architecture, construction majors, but those majors as a whole, educating them about different careers within construction."

Novak stressed the goal is to expand into high schools next year, to reach students as they start making career decisions. She added the group's Student Recognition Program, launched in 2020, highlights young women pursuing careers in STEM and construction, aiming to inspire younger girls and strengthen the future talent pipeline.


get more stories like this via email