Backers of President Joe Biden's rent cap proposal said it could benefit many New Yorkers.

The plan calls for capping rent increases at 5% in apartments owned by corporate landlords, or those landlords risk losing federal tax breaks. It comes as statewide rents are rapidly increasing. As of this month, New York City rents are 147% higher than the national average.

Cea Weaver, campaign coordinator for the group Housing Justice For All, said capping rents could greatly benefit New Yorkers struggling with housing costs.

"Many New Yorkers are already benefiting from stronger protections than what Biden has called for," Weaver acknowledged. "But for places that haven't opted into rent stabilization, which is many, in upstate New York especially, this would be hugely important, since half the state rents an unregulated apartment and this is potentially a lifeline."

The rent cap plan will require approval from Congress. It includes the Department of Housing and Urban Development investing $325 million nationwide in "Choice Neighborhood" grants, to support building affordable homes across the country.

Syracuse received $50 million from the program to build 1,400 affordable units. It comes as 31,000 households in Onondaga County spend more than one-third of their income on housing.

Beyond Biden's plan, New York's own good cause eviction protections passed earlier this year can help tenants. Since becoming law in May, four cities have opted in to the program. Though some housing advocates were against making it optional, Weaver noted the protections it offers reverberate in cities taking advantage of it.

"Right now, tenants in New York State have the right to renew their lease unless their landlord has a good reason to deny a lease renewal," Weaver explained. "The statutory protection is to remain in their home. And there's a nix on rent increases if you're rent-stabilized; it depends on what your local rent board voted for."

She notes cities adopting good cause eviction protections are also protecting tenants from almost 9% rent increases. Rochester and some Hudson Valley cities are considering opting in to these protections.


get more stories like this via email

A new report found Hoosier homeowners and renters face significant challenges from environmental hazards and climate change.

"The State of Fair Housing in Indiana" report from the Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana, highlighted a growing concern over environmental issues like air pollution, lead exposure and rising water levels, which are disproportionately affecting Black and brown communities and families with children.

Brady Ripperger, deputy director of administration and advocacy at the center, called it environmental racism.

"If you've not heard of that, it's really important to be aware of that as we discuss climate change in our state and ensuring that our formerly redlined communities are not the ones that are the least protected when it comes to environmental disasters," Ripperger asserted.

The report showed many Superfund sites, polluted areas needing extensive cleanup, are in historically redlined neighborhoods, primarily home to communities of color. The areas often suffer from poor air quality, lack of tree coverage and higher heat exposure, particularly in cities like Gary and Indianapolis.

Ripperger pointed out one alarming finding in the report is the effect of regional airports, such as Purdue University Airport, where nearby residents face higher risks of lead-based airborne pollution.

"Regional airports that use smaller aircraft still use lead-based gasoline," Ripperger explained. "We specifically in the report looked at West Lafayette and found that there's a large despair of impact for individuals of color, specifically Asian Americans and Hispanics or Latino residents."

Ripperger argued without action soon, environmental hazards will continue to haunt and harm Hoosiers.

"There're major issues across the country in housing stock," Ripperger outlined. "There might be more prevalence in locations to Superfund sites or brownfield sites, there might be lack of tree coverage which is so important as the environment is getting hotter and hotter, and then there're also issues such as air quality."


get more stories like this via email

From July, 2023 to July, 2024, Nebraska landlords filed more than 10,000 eviction cases. That's compared with an average of around 8,400 filings per year between 2012 and 2019. Legal Aid of Nebraska's Housing Justice Project represents hundreds of Nebraskans facing eviction each year, and a new $50,000 grant from the United Way of the Midlands will help with this work.

Scott Mertz, Housing Justice Project Director, said the shortage of quality affordable housing makes it a bit of a "seller's market," contributing to the rise in evictions.

"People are not shy about just going right to eviction court when they have tenants that they want to just get rid of. It's relatively easy; it's relatively quick," he explained. "That's also something we'd like to push back against - make it a little more difficult, make it a little more time-consuming, so that people aren't just going right to the eviction."

Mertz pointed out that even when an eviction filing in Nebraska ends without a court judgment, it will show up on a person's background check. This can impact their housing and even employment options for years to come. In 2023, 60% of eviction filings nationwide were against women, with Black women disproportionately represented.

A "clean-slate" bill which would have "sealed" eviction filings when cases were dismissed or vacated was unsuccessful in the recent Unicameral session. Mertz says the potential long-term harm an eviction filing can cause keeps a percentage of the people they see from pursuing their rights in court.

"They talk to us and say, "Well, I got this notice; I don't agree with it." We think there's a case here; there's evidence. We're more than happy to present it. But they leave anyway because it's scary - having a day in court and having your name in a case that's never going to go away, " he continued.

Mertz said the United Way grant will help toward their goal of doing more "affirmative litigation," that is, addressing issues before they reach a court filing.

"Quality of housing, conditions, safety concerns, discriminatory practices in renting or terminating housing. These are all things that happen all the time, and we can only do so much with the resources and the amount of attorney hours that we have, " he explained.

He encourages anyone concerned they face a risk of losing their housing to call or go online to find out what their rights and options are. And he stresses that things move very fast from eviction notice to court date.

The U.S. Justice Department has issued a ruling against a Livingston, Montana, landlord for discriminating against a tenant. The consent decree requires the defendant to complete training on discrimination in housing and awards the complainant $25,000.

A tenant of a Livingston apartment complex alleged Yellowstone Apartments landlord Dana Christian discriminated against her after the tenant asked Christian to stop making advances toward her daughter who was visiting her mother from Russia. The complaint alleged Christian made life increasingly difficult for the tenant after the complaint, even though she had lived there for years with no issues. The Justice Department ordered Christian to pay $25,000 to compensate her for moving costs, time and emotional hardship.

Pam Bean, executive director of the nonprofit Montana Fair Housing, said the ruling sets a precedent for equal housing opportunity.

"When issues arise such as did with this complainant, there's an avenue to address those, hopefully prior to the filing of complaints," Bean explained.

The federal court ruling also requires Christian to undergo training on what constitutes housing discrimination and post Montana's fair housing guidelines on the properties he manages.

Bean called the ruling a win for renters across Montana, who sometimes feel like they do not have the power to fight landlord discrimination cases for fear of the same type of retribution laid out in the Christian case.

"Providing housing providers the message that this behavior is intolerable and is illegal," Bean added.

Christian has not responded to requests for comment.